Aims and Scope

IJAMR publishes peer reviewed articles of contemporary research in medical and allied health sciences, and recent advancements in biomedical and health care science. The editorial board of IJAMR shall strive to maintain highest standards of quality and ethics in its publication. The journal would provide a common forum where all aspects of Medical, Clinical, Allied Health Sciences and Pharmaceutical Sciences would be published. The journal would provide a platform to publish original research papers, short reports, short communication, letter to the editor, case reports and review articles from renowned professionals in their respective fields of expertise provided they are not published elsewhere or not being considered for publication.

Publication Frequency

This journal publishes articles on quarterly basis (Four Issues/year)

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Editorial Board


Dr. Tirthankar Ghosh, PhD
Associate Professor
Department of Physiology
Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences
Raipur, Chhattisgarh

Executive Editors:

Dr. Kusal K. Das, PhD
Professor, Department of Physiology
Faculty of Medicine
BLDE University
Bijapur, Karnataka

Dr. Madhusudan Pal, PhD
Ergonomics Laboratory
Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences
Lucknow Road

Dr. Sunil Kumar Joshi
Associate Professor
Department of Community Medicine
Kathmandu Medical College, Sinamangal.
Kathmandu, Nepal
Adjunct Faculty Member
Kent State University College of Public Heal th,
Kent, USA
National Secretary for Nepal
International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH)

Mrs. Jaita Mondal, MSc, MBA
RIMS College of Nursing
AFF: Ayush & Health Science University
Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

International Editorial Board

Dr. Manik Chatterjee
Professor & HOD
Dept. of Anatomy
Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur

Dr. Dipendra Goswami
Community Medicine,
National Medical College,
Kolkata and Co-ordinator, NACO, Govt of West Bengal.
Dr. Shyam Pingle
Senior Occupational Health Specialist & Adjunct Professor
Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI)

Dr. Mukesh Pandey
Associate Professor
Dept. of Physiology,
RIMS, Raipur

Prof. (Dr) N Udaya Kiran, MD
Formerly vice-principal, GSL Medical college
Professor & Head, Department of Community Medicine,
KSHEMA, Nitte university, Deralakatte,
Mangalore, India

Dr. Sarmishtha Ghosh, PhD
Professor & HOD, Physiology
Faculty of Medicine
MAHSA, Kuala Lumpur 59100

Dr. Brajendra Kumar
Professor, Dept. of General Medicine, RIMS

Dr. Utpal Kumar Biswas, MD, DCP
Professor and Head,
NRS Medical College Hospital,

Dr. Shreyasi Vaksh
Associate Professor,
Dept. of Physiology, RIMS, Raipur

Dr. Kamlesh K. Jain
State Nodal Officer, (COPD-NCD Cell)
Directorate Health Service
CG Govt, Raipur

Dr. Prashant Agarwala, PhD
Associate Professor,
Forensic Medicine,
Galghotia College,
Greater Noida,

Dr. Naveen R.
Department of Community Health
St. John's Medical College,
Bangalore 560034,

Dr. Gautam Nalam, Pediatric Dentist, BDS, MDS, FAGE
Associate Professor,
Gitam Dental College
Andhra Pradesh

Dr. Sanjay Dwivdi
Professor, Plastic Surgery, HIMS

Dr. G. P. Soni
Professor & HOD Community Medicine
Pt J.N.M. Medical College, Raipur

Dr. Meenakshi Sinha
Professor, Dept. of Physiology,
AIIMS, Raipur

Prof.(Dr.) Mitashree Mitra
Professor & Incharge-Head,
School of Regional Studies and Research, Pt. R S U

Dr. P. Sudhir Babu
Professor, Dept. of OBG, RIMS

Dr. Jyoti Dwivedi
Professor, Dept. of Physiology, HIMS

Dr. Navichandra M Kavre
Professor, Dept. of Microbiology, RIMS

Publication Ethics

The publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for our journal "Asian Journal of Bio-Medical Research".

It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher.

Our ethic statements are based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Publication decisions

The editor of the journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.

The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

AJBR Plagiarism Committee:

I. Editor-in-chief, AJBR
II. Chief Executive Editor, AJBR
III. Executive Editors, IJNRP


Coming soon